Every six calendar month or so , roving processing giant Qualcomm announces its tardy and greatest Snapdragon processor , a piece of silicon that will discover its direction into the newest Android handset , making your life faster and better and so much high - resolution than the one-time , crummy Snapdragon . Only , in the case ofSnapdragon 810 , that ’s not straight .
https://gizmodo.com/qualcomms-snapdragon-810-is-way-more-than-just-a-faster-1670023456
Ars Technicaworked with mobile benchmark troupe Geekbench to test how various generations of the 8xx - series Snapdragon chips do under load , over an extended period of time . That ’s important , because extended load on a mainframe do it to stir up up , and eventually the central processing unit will throttle its own performance , to keep the temperature under ascendency .

Arsfound that the Old 805 central processor in the Galaxy Note 4 stayed consistently close to its max clock speed of 2.7GHz for 12 minutes , finally settling down around 2.0GHz . The Snapdragon 810 in the LG G Flex 2 , on the other bridge player , only briefly touched on its max 2.0GHz clock swiftness , throttling after a minute of arc and spending most of the test around 1.0GHz .
Those numbers do n’t necessarily intend that the 810 chip is dust , and you should straight off throw your brand newHTC One M9into a river in disgust . Benchmark tests like this are n’t a one - size - burst - all , apple - to - apples comparison ; and , moreover , mainframe performance relies to a great extent on the speech sound the mainframe is in , since French telephone designing sham the caloric properties in a big way . Not to cite , the 810 has some nerveless magic trick that are n’t link up to bleak processing power .
https://gizmodo.com/htc-one-m9-review-a-great-phone-that-cant-keep-up-1692880041

But whichever way you convolute it , it ’s empty the newer 810 processor is outperform by its 805 cousin-german in some central processing unit - relate chore ( when used for any extensive period of time ) . That ’s not a catastrophe in and of itself : let ’s be honest , both chipsets are belike still way quicker than you will ever need . But it is a unspoilt reminder that number — whether of megapixels , pixels , number of British citizenry invovled in the design , whatever — do n’t tell the whole account .
Also , perhaps defend off purchasing thatHTC Oneuntil next yr ’s example hail out , ok ?
[ Ars Technica ]

get in touch with the author at[email protect ] .
QualcommSmartphonessnapdragonTech
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and culture tidings in your inbox daily .
News from the time to come , delivered to your present tense .
You May Also Like











![]()
