Daryl Hall and John Oates.Photo:Michael Tran/FilmMagic

Daryl Hall and John Oats

Michael Tran/FilmMagic

Daryl Hallhas filed a first-person declaration explaining his side of the story as a legal fight with his Hall & Oates bandmate continues.

He adds, “I believe that John Oates timed the Unauthorized Transaction to create the most harm to me. Respectfully, he must be stopped from this latest wrongdoing and his malicious conduct reined in once and for all.”

In the declaration, Hall called Oates' move “completely clandestine” and in “bad faith,” leading him to feel “ambushed.”

Daryl Hall and John Oates.Michael Ochs Archives/Getty

CIRCA 1970: Photo of Hall & Oates

Michael Ochs Archives/Getty

Lawyers for both Hall and Oates did not immediately respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment.

On Nov. 9, Hall initiated an arbitration process against Oates to prevent his bandmate from transferring 100% of his right, title and interest in Whole Oats to a third-party buyer calledPrimary Wave Musicwithout Hall’s consent, a transaction he claims is “unauthorized and void” and a breach of contract. Hall alleged that Oates had entered into a letter of intent with Primary Wave that could’ve closed as early as Nov. 20, and Hall argued that the sale would cause him “imminent irreparable harm.”

When Hall’s court complaint was filed on Nov. 16, no arbitrator had been chosen, leaving Hall unable to pursue his pending request in the arbitration for temporary injunctive relief in the manner requested.

He alleged in documents that he sought the restraining order against Oates — which was granted the next day — in order to close the Primary Wave transaction “so as to maintain the status quo of WOE before there is a change in control of the partnership in violation of the terms of the Agreement.”

Primary Wave has already owned significant interest in the Grammy-nominated musicians’ song catalog for more than 15 years, according to theAssociated Press.

Hall’s attorneys said much of the matter should remain under seal because it is a “private dispute… This is not a matter of legitimate public interest, although the parties are well known.” His legal team noted that the dispute concerns the interpretation of the 2021 agreement, the terms of which remain confidential.

The case will ultimately be decided in a confidential arbitration process. A hearing is set for Thursday, Nov. 30 to consider extending the restraining order.

Though he has not publicly commented, Oates has posted to social media since the drama began, sharing amessage on X (formerly Twitter)on Nov. 22 that encouraged people to support local charities.

“During this time of communal reflection and connection with loved ones, let’s not forget those experiencing challenges globally,” he wrote. “As we come together, consider reaching out to support those in need—whether through local charities or international humanitarian initiatives. May our collective efforts contribute to a more compassionate and supportive world. J.O. 👊🏽.”

source: people.com